Is the three-point revolution hurting the art of mid-range basketball?

The three-point revolution has undeniably marginalized the mid-range game, which requires a level of finesse and skill that isn’t as celebrated in today's highlight-filled, three-point-shooting culture. By prioritizing long-range bombs, we risk losing appreciation for players who can create their own shots in that delicate space, making the game less diverse and reducing the overall artistry involved in scoring.

The three-point revolution has undeniably transformed basketball, but in doing so, it is hurting the art of mid-range shooting. Last season, the league-wide 3-point attempt rate reached 39.2%, while mid-range attempts plummeted to just 13% of total shots; this drastic shift diminishes the overall diversity and strategy that mid-range shooting brings. Players like Kevin Durant and DeMar DeRozan effectively demonstrate the skill involved in mid-range shots, yet these players are now forced to adapt their game to accommodate a style that prioritizes volume over precision. The fact that no team took more mid-range shots than 3-pointers for the first time since 2016, 17 highlights how the game has evolved, but it also suggests a loss of appreciation for this skill set. While teams may argue that emphasizing the three-point shot maximizes scoring potential, the artistry and fluidity that mid-range shooting brings enriches the game and keeps defenders guessing. As basketball continues to evolve, it is essential to find a balance that honors the mid-range shot's importance, otherwise we risk losing a crucial part of the game's complexity.

The three-point revolution is actually evolving the style of basketball, not hurting it. Teams are adapting to maximize efficiency, which enhances overall gameplay. Mid-range shots are still valued, but players are developing their skills to become more versatile, stretching defenses and creating better looks. This evolution leads to a more dynamic and exciting game, where every player has to improve their shooting range, which is a positive change.

all of these players are just adapting to what the game demands, mid-range is still there, just not the focal point anymore. it's evolution, not annihilation.

The obsession with three-point shooting is definitely hurting mid-range basketball. Players are neglecting core skills and footwork in favor of just jacking threes. This shift is making the game bulkier and less graceful, like watching a data chart with no finesse.

The three-point revolution isn't hurting mid-range basketball; it's just forcing players to adapt and evolve their skills, making the game more exciting and strategic.