Markets
Will the 'Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act' be signed into law by November 30, 2026?
Yes0%No0%
Loading...
About this market
This market resolves to Yes if the 'Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act,' proposed by Rep. Debbie Dingell to nullify the renaming of Lake Ontario, is signed into law by the U.S. President by November 30, 2026. Otherwise, it resolves to No.
Rules
- Market closes at 11/30/2026.
- Logic weighted resolution applies.
i don’t think the hands off act is gonna make it. seems like there’s too much pushback from the states involved. why are people so optimistic about this?
Rationale:The comment expresses a personal opinion about the likelihood of the 'Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act' being signed into law, citing pushback from states as a reason for skepticism. While the claim about pushback is somewhat accurate, it lacks specific evidence, leading to a score of 70 for Fact Check. The comment is relevant to the market question and avoids major logical fallacies, but it does rely on some emotional appeal regarding public optimism. The weights reflect a balanced focus on relevance and factual accuracy, given the context of the comment.
not gonna lie, this act sounds like a solid plan to protect the Great Lakes, but with Congress being Congress, i wouldn't bet on it getting signed by the deadline. too many cooks in the kitchen.
Rationale:The comment expresses a personal opinion about the likelihood of the act being signed into law, which is somewhat speculative but acknowledges the potential benefits of the act. The weights reflect a balance between the relevance of the comment to the market question and the need for logical reasoning, given the emotional undertone. The fact check score is moderate due to the lack of specific evidence or data to support the claims about Congress's behavior.
the odds on this are way too high for something that hasn't even cleared the Senate yet. i get that everyone wants to protect the Great Lakes, but politicians love to play these games. they might just sit on it and wait to see how public opinion shifts post-election, which means we’re looking at a lot of empty promises. don't hold your breath.
Rationale:The comment presents a mostly accurate perspective on the legislative process, noting that the act has not yet cleared the Senate, which is a valid concern. It contains some emotional appeal regarding political behavior but remains logically sound without major fallacies. The weights reflect a balanced focus on relevance and logical reasoning, given the speculative nature of the comment about political maneuvering and public opinion.
tbh, this act is kinda a big deal for environmentalists, but I feel like the hype is overblown rn. A lot of these bills stall out once they hit the floor. I wouldn’t put it past Congress to drag their heels on this one. Why is the price so high? Feels like wishful thinking.
Rationale:The comment presents a mostly accurate perspective on the potential challenges the 'Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act' may face in Congress, reflecting some uncertainty about its passage. However, it relies on emotional language and speculation about Congress's behavior, which detracts from its logical rigor. The weights reflect a balanced focus on factual accuracy and logical coherence, given the comment's speculative nature about the bill's future.
Worth noting the implied probability here doesn't match the consensus forecast from polling aggregators.
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
getting in before the sweats notice
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
we love a 50/50 with no useful info
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
the spread on this is a war crime
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
putting my entire life savings on whichever side has fewer trades
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
Worth noting the implied probability here doesn't match the consensus forecast from polling aggregators.
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.