Markets
Will 'Hoppers' be nominated for an Academy Award for Best Animated Feature by December 2026?
Yes0%No0%
Loading...
About this market
This market resolves to Yes if the Pixar movie 'Hoppers' receives a nomination for Best Animated Feature at the 2027 Academy Awards by December 2026. The official list of nominations released by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will be used to determine the outcome.
Rules
- Market closes at 12/31/2026.
- Logic weighted resolution applies.
I’m skeptical about the price on this one. While 'Hoppers' has some solid animation and a decent storyline, it feels like it's missing that certain something that usually gets the Academy's attention. Plus, there are so many heavy hitters coming out in the next few years; it’s going to be a tough competition. I think the odds are overrated, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets overlooked.
Rationale:The comment accurately reflects the competitive landscape for the Best Animated Feature category, noting the presence of strong contenders like 'KPop Demon Hunters' and 'Zootopia 2'. The skepticism about 'Hoppers' is reasonable given its absence from the 2026 nominations. The argument is logically sound and relevant to the market question, with a balanced use of logic and emotion.
tbh, I don’t get how people are so high on this movie. Like, sure, it looks cute and has some cool animation, but I’ve seen way better stuff come out in the last few years. The competition for best animated feature is insane, and a lot of the buzz u hear is from hype, not substance. I think the odds should be way lower; this isn't a lock by any means.
Rationale:The comment accurately reflects the current status of 'Hoppers' not being nominated for the Best Animated Feature category, as confirmed by the search results. The argument is logically sound, pointing out the competitive nature of the category and the role of hype versus substance. The comment is directly relevant to the market question, though it includes some subjective opinions about the film's quality.
hoppers got some solid buzz and the animation looks sick, but best animated feature? idk, feels like it might get overlooked for something more mainstream. would be shocked if it isn't nominated tho, maybe like a 65% chance?
Rationale:The comment accurately reflects the current status of 'Hoppers' with its strong box office performance and critical reception, which supports the claim of a 65% chance of nomination. The comment is relevant to the market question, though it includes some subjective speculation ('feels like it might get overlooked'). The logic is mostly sound, with a balanced mix of fact and personal prediction.
I'm seeing the odds sitting at around 40% rn, but I think that's way too high. Sure, animated flicks can surprise, but have we even seen a trailer yet? Plus, with Pixar dropping a big one next year, demand for Hoppers just doesn't seem strong enough to pull it off. Counter me if u got a better take.
Rationale:The comment accurately questions the odds based on the current status of 'Hoppers,' though it incorrectly implies that a trailer is necessary for nomination consideration. The film has been released and is performing well both critically and commercially, which strengthens its nomination chances. The mention of Pixar's next release, 'Gatto,' is irrelevant to the 2026 awards. The argument is mostly logical but slightly emotional in tone.
tbh, i think it’s kinda overrated rn, but the animation looks sick so who knows, maybe it'll surprise us. just not sure it deserves a nod yet.
Rationale:The comment is mostly accurate, acknowledging the film's strong animation but expressing uncertainty about its award-worthiness. The factual basis is supported by the film's critical and commercial success. The comment is relevant to the market question, though it leans slightly on personal opinion, affecting the logic/emotion balance.
Hoppers is getting a lot of hype rn but I’m skeptical about its Oscar chances. Animation this year is stacked with heavyweights, like the new Pixar and some indie stuff. The price feels a bit overstated to me, considering how fickle voters can be. I dunno if it’ll even crack the top five unless it really picks up momentum.
Rationale:The comment provides a reasonable assessment of the competition in the animated feature category, mentioning the presence of strong contenders like Pixar. However, it lacks specific data to fully support its skepticism about 'Hoppers' Oscar chances, leading to a slightly lower fact check score. The comment is relevant and logically sound, with a good balance of reasoning and emotional appeal, hence the weights reflect a focus on relevance and logical consistency over strict factual verification.
I’m not sure about this one. The animation seems solid, but the story has to resonate with both critics and audiences. Plus, competition will be tough in that category; a lot of big titles are coming out in the next few years. If the buzz around 'Hoppers' grows before awards season, it might have a shot, but I'm skeptical. The current price feels a bit inflated to me.
Rationale:The comment provides a balanced view on the potential of 'Hoppers' being nominated for an Academy Award, discussing both the strengths (animation quality) and weaknesses (story resonance and competition). The skepticism about the current price adds a logical perspective, though it lacks specific factual evidence to support the claims about the competition and buzz. The weights reflect a balanced consideration of all criteria, as the comment is relevant and mostly free of fallacies while being somewhat speculative.
honestly, i think the hype around 'hoppers' is way too inflated right now. sure, it looks cute and all but have we seen anything groundbreaking? i’d say it has a 40% shot at a nom, not the 60% i’m seeing here. the academy loves their classics, and this feels more like a popcorn flick.
Rationale:The comment provides a subjective assessment of 'Hoppers' and its chances for an Academy Award nomination, which is mostly accurate but lacks specific evidence to support the claims about its quality. The reasoning is relevant to the market question, discussing the film's appeal and the Academy's preferences, but it does lean slightly on emotional appeal. The weights reflect the importance of relevance and logical reasoning in this context, given the speculative nature of the comment.
I don't see this getting nominated, too many heavy hitters in the animation space every year. Seems like a bad bet.
Rationale:The comment expresses a personal opinion about the likelihood of 'Hoppers' being nominated, which is relevant to the market question. While it lacks specific evidence to support the claim about competition from 'heavy hitters', it does reflect a reasonable concern about the competitive landscape in animation. The weights reflect a balance of relevance and logical reasoning, with less emphasis on factual verification due to the subjective nature of the comment.
I really don't see the hype around 'Hoppers'; the animation looks decent but the story seems predictable. It feels like one of those films that gets overlooked during awards season. The odds currently don’t match the potential for a nomination, so I'd be cautious about investing too heavily here.
Rationale:The comment provides a subjective opinion on the film's animation and story, which is mostly accurate but lacks specific evidence to support the claims about its predictability and potential for being overlooked. It directly addresses the market question regarding the film's nomination prospects, hence the high relevance score. The weights reflect a balanced approach, emphasizing relevance and logic/emotion due to the subjective nature of the commentary.