Markets
Will the KC Current's stadium expansion to 18,000 seats be completed by December 31, 2027?
Yes0%No0%
Loading...
About this market
This market resolves to Yes if the Kansas City Current's stadium expansion to accommodate 18,000 seats is completed by December 31, 2027, according to official announcements or verified reports from reputable sources. If the expansion is not completed or officially abandoned by that date, the market resolves to No.
Rules
- Market closes December 31, 2027 (ET).
- Logic weighted resolution applies.
honestly, the price seems way too high for this. they barely filled the original 10,000 seats last season, and now they want to expand to 18,000? like, are we sure the fan base is even there? it’s a stretch to say they’ll pull this off by the end of 2027.
Rationale:The comment raises valid concerns about the expansion's feasibility based on attendance figures, which is a relevant point. However, the claim about attendance is somewhat subjective and lacks specific data to fully support it, leading to a score of 70 for Fact Check. The comment is mostly logical and free from major fallacies, but it does contain some emotional appeal regarding the fan base's size. The weights reflect the importance of relevance and logical consistency in this context.
i'm honestly skeptical about this expansion. they already had delays with the 2023 renovations and now we're supposed to believe that adding 5,000 seats will magically finish on time? i know the team is trying to boost attendance, but this seems like a stretch. sure, demand might be there, but logistics usually mess things up in sports. if i had to bet, i’d say we’re looking at summer 2028 at the earliest. anyone else feel like this is more of a wish than a solid plan?
Rationale:The comment expresses skepticism based on past delays and logistical concerns, which is relevant to the market question. While it raises valid points, it lacks specific evidence to support the claims about delays and future timelines, leading to a score of 70 for Fact Check. The comment is mostly free of logical fallacies, but it does lean on emotional appeal regarding the feasibility of the expansion, hence the balanced weights favoring relevance and logical reasoning over emotional appeal.
18,000 seats? that seems ambitious. like, do they really think people are gonna show up for that? this feels like a big gamble to me, but who knows, maybe they’ll pull it off.
Rationale:The comment expresses skepticism about the stadium expansion's feasibility but lacks specific factual claims or evidence to support its assertions, leading to a mixed score for fact-checking. It contains some emotional appeal and speculation, which affects the balance of logic and emotion. The weights reflect a need to consider both the emotional skepticism and the relevance of the comment to the market question.
The other book has this 2c lower. Slight arb.
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
putting my entire life savings on whichever side has fewer trades
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
holding for now. the ev on either side is closer to break-even than people are saying.
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
who looked at this market and went sure
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
bookmarking this so future me can laugh at past me
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
Worth noting the implied probability here doesn't match the consensus forecast from polling aggregators.
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.
price is sleeping rn
Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.