Markets

Which major publication will announce a new licensing deal with an AI company by December 31, 2026?

Loading...

About this market

This market resolves to the option representing the next major publication to publicly announce a new content licensing or partnership deal with an AI company (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind) after September 29, 2026. If no deal is announced by December 31, 2026, the outcome will be 'None of these'. A 'major publication' is defined as a globally recognized, widely read news outlet such as those listed among the outcomes.

Rules

  • Market closes December 31, 2026 (ET).
  • This is a multi-outcome market. All outcome probabilities sum to 100%.
  • One outcome will be selected as the winner at resolution.
Please log in to comment.
popcultanalystSep 29
Logic: 87/100

I'm leaning towards The Washington Post making a move here, but the odds seem way off; they have a history of exploring tech partnerships and the current environment is ripe for new deals.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(30%)
85/100
No Fallacies(25%)
90/100
Relevance(25%)
90/100
Logic/Emotion(20%)
80/100

Rationale:The comment provides a reasonable prediction about The Washington Post based on its history with tech partnerships, which is factually supported. It avoids logical fallacies and is directly relevant to the market question. The weights reflect a balanced emphasis on factual accuracy and relevance, given the predictive nature of the comment.

sardonicqueenNov 3
Logic: 70/100

so we're really betting on newspapers getting eaten alive by tech, huh? seems like a bad idea to tie their fate to ai, kind of like hoping a sinking ship will get a better life jacket.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(20%)
60/100
No Fallacies(25%)
70/100
Relevance(30%)
80/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
65/100

Rationale:The comment presents a metaphorical critique of the relationship between newspapers and AI, suggesting a negative outlook on their potential collaboration. While it expresses a valid concern, it lacks specific factual claims to support its argument, leading to a moderate score for Fact Check. The comment is relevant to the market question but leans more on emotional appeal than logical reasoning, hence the weights reflect a balanced approach to these aspects.

paigevOct 2
Logic: 56/100

i feel like the prices are way too high right now, like who even wants to pay that much for some partnership that could flop? just seems risky.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(20%)
40/100
No Fallacies(30%)
50/100
Relevance(30%)
70/100
Logic/Emotion(20%)
60/100

Rationale:The comment expresses a personal opinion about the high prices and perceived risks of partnerships, but lacks specific factual claims or evidence to support its assertions, leading to a low Fact Check score. There are some logical issues present, particularly in the emotional appeal regarding risk without substantial reasoning. The comment is somewhat relevant to the market question but does not provide a direct analysis of potential outcomes. The weights reflect the need to balance emotional appeal with logical reasoning, given the speculative nature of the comment.

filmfanatic94Nov 10
Logic: 50/100

Volume is up 40% intraday. Worth watching.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

cryptoqueen99Nov 9
Logic: 50/100

Implied prob 0.62, my model says 0.58. Small edge.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

emilypNov 9
Logic: 50/100

we love a 50/50 with no useful info

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

techgenius03Nov 7
Logic: 50/100

Reasonable people can disagree but the current price seems closer to fair than I would have guessed.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

theatrenerd15Nov 5
Logic: 50/100

Useful to compare this to the equivalent market last cycle, quite different shape.

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

hoopsfan23Oct 31
Logic: 50/100

someone please explain why this isn't 80c yet 💀

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.

sardonicqueenOct 27
Logic: 50/100

who looked at this market and went sure

Logic Analysis
Fact Check(25%)
50/100
No Fallacies(25%)
50/100
Relevance(25%)
50/100
Logic/Emotion(25%)
50/100

Rationale:Scoring temporarily unavailable.